Summary
A study conducted by Katharina Karl and Markus Dumberger at Eichstätt Catholic University analyzed a sixth Synod of the Word meeting, aiming to evaluate whether it was successful in addressing systemic causes of sexual violence. The study found that the primary goal of the reform project had been largely missed—reconciling systems causing sexualized violence. While participants generally saw the synod as contributing significantly to church renewal and aiding in de-tabooing previously unspeakable topics, they were notably critical of its results. Specifically, about half of those who participated (including less than a third of bishops) agreed that the Synod had not achieved its original aim—ending systemic causes of sexual violence. They also felt disconnected from decisions made during the synod and perceived pressure to conform rather than contribute constructively. The study divided participants into three groups: “Change-Oriented,” who felt the resolutions were insufficient; “Critical Conservators,” who thought they went too far; and “Pragmatic Idealists” who found it in the middle, with some hesitation. This last group was particularly critical of the synod’s decision to allow public voting during the event. The summary concluded that while most participants saw positive outcomes from the Synod of the Word, there were significant criticisms regarding its effectiveness and methods.
Key Topics
Vatican City, Synodale Weg, sexual abuse
