Summary
In response to a controversial upcoming consecration by the Fraternity of the Society of St. Pius X (FSSPX), which emerged from Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre’s group that adhered to the principle “quod semper, quod ubique, quod ab omnibus” (what the Church has always taught, everywhere, and by all), this article addresses the metaphysical issues at hand. The main concern is whether the coming consecration of bishops without papal approval aligns with Catholic tradition. While critics argue that discouraging valid Mass attendance could harm souls, defenders maintain that the FSSPX believes the Novus Ordo rite, as a practice, is objectively harmful to faith. This article evaluates arguments against the consecration by distinguishing between validity and form, legitimacy and identity, governance and continuity, and pastoral application versus metaphysical structure. It does not psychoanalyze motives or defend the SSPX, but rather judges the claims made against its actions within the context of Catholic tradition.
Key Topics
FSSPX, Lefebvre, Metaphysics
